Post by David on Oct 12, 2015 14:37:57 GMT -8
10.12.15 -
The bitter divorce between the Spokane Shock and the Arena Football League took a drastic turn on Monday. The AFL released a public statement regarding the rights to the Shock name and trademarks, stating that they would keep the name and trademarks rather than let the franchise keep its identity.
The Arena Football League has been in discussions with the Spokane Shock about allowing them to continue using the Shock name and trademarks. The rights to all Spokane Shock trademarks and logos are owned by the AFL and there have been earnest attempts to reach an agreement for the acquisition of those marks. Unfortunately, those attempts have not come to fruition and the League will retain the rights to the Spokane Shock name. The League intends to have a presence in the State of Washington again in the near future.
This has been a widely speculated topic on the ArenaFan message boards, as all teams and their trademarks are property of the Arena Football League. In an 2015 Season episode of the AFL Tonight Podcast, hosts Tim Capper and Adam Markowitz suspected if the Shock were to move to the Indoor Football League, they would have to pay a hefty price to purchase the name and trademarks.
It's worth noting that the Iowa Barnstormers were able to retain their trademarks when they departed the AFL for the IFL prior to the 2015 season. The only tweak to their logo was the removal of "Arena Football Club" in their logo to "Football Club" when they dropped to the IFL.
Another former AFL team trademark, the Colorado Crush, recently expired in 2014. At the conclusion of the 2015 IFL season, the Colorado Ice purchased the Crush trademark and have re-branded the franchise.
The AFL's remark about "earnest attempts to reach an agreement" sounds as if the AFL is expressing sour grapes, which could be one of two things:
- They're upset that the IFL has acquired 2 former AFL teams in addition to the trademarks to the former Crush franchise in Denver. Considering the IFL has been looking more sound in terms of an economic model and its desire for parity, the league could feel that the IFL is their biggest threat and will do anything to prevent the IFL from succeeding.
- The feud between Shock owner Nader Naini and the AFL. Naini has been vocal about his dissatisfaction with the league, accusing Commissioner Scott Butera and some of its teams of cheating, favoring the more established franchises and not fulfilling obligations to improve the product with national sponsorship partners. According to Naini back in August, he felt that there was "little to no progress" made. This sounds like the AFL's way of telling Naini to "shove it."
The AFL's decision, and their presumptuous idea that another AFL franchise will come to Washington State, is spineless and juvenile. They've already alienated the Spokane market, the second biggest city in the state of Washington, with unbalanced teams and the assumption that the AFL would work in Seattle is a stretch. The league may assume that the Seattle sports market was interested in the AFL, but there's no guarantee the fans would care enough about arena football.
The AFL's decision creates a real mess for Spokane and the IFL, which has been using the Shock logo in its news and for promoting the 2016 IFL schedule. The team could try and continue negotiations for the team name or simply re-brand the franchise, which could alienate Shock fans that have supported the team since its inception.
Spokane has not issued a statement regarding this decision. Keith Osso of KXLY ABC-4 and 700 ESPN AM reported that the Shock said they are still trying to work out a deal with the AFL and will address the issue when it is final. We will update as soon as the franchise responds to the news.
- DKH
To comment on this thread and others on this forum, please login or register.